SheShe - take up with Robin Hood if you have a problem.
I just OBJECTIVELY spent the last few HOURS today answering all the "reports" by essentially the same people accusing each other of personal attacks.
I edited BOTH conservatives and liberals comments in my reports which Robin Hood can read at his liesure. All were treated fairly. All reports answered.
Thanks, Sheka. Excellent post.
AMEN!
{This
post has been edited. REASON: Attack on another poster or moderator}
{This post has been edited. REASON: Attack on another poster}
Following the rules means:
If you are blocked, you do not sign back on with a different name.
If you are banned, you do not sign back on with a different name.
Or did you forget about those rules?
And that was my sole purpose for starting this thread. I have been reading what is taking place this morning.
St. Paulie, you don't enforce any rules around here. Now you do have a little opportunity to get away with not following the rules because you and her are on the same page.
I made it clear to her yesterday that I would return right away and I have no intentions of pretending that I am not SheShe.
I would respect you more if you could debate as an adult and answer questions posed to you, instead of always insulting those who disagree with your position..sheka or sheshe.
Jst the fact, I would respect you if you asked reasonable questions and not silly ones to just bait. So if you want to debate me on something, make it worth my time. You only post one-liners and broad meaningless questions. To be honest, all that I do know about any of your positions is that you dislike President Obama. I haven't read any policy issues from you???
SAYING THAT A POSTER IS 'FULL OF SHIT' IS A DIRECT ATTACK!
I made it clear to her yesterday that I would return right away and I have no intentions of pretending that I am not SheShe.
Are you serious? Just because you make something "clear" doesn't mean you don't have to follow the same rules as everyone else. If you're blocked . . . you're supposed to be blocked . . . (roll eyes)
Yes, saying another poster is "full of shit" is as personal and direct!
It is what it is and no twisting out of it.
Go ahead and roll your eyes St. Paulie, it means nothing to me. SheShe isn't blocked right now but I am keeping my Sheka moniker simply because I want too!
Without respect, there is no real power.
I learned that a long time ago.
I second SheShe's (Sheka's) post! This has got to stop. If moderation is unfair and clearly biased it is a drain on the entire forum!
As someone suggested yesterday . . . Hoodie needs to do a clean sweep and wipe out all multiple monikers. And if anyone creates a new one using the same IP address, that person should be banned from the forum.
St. Paulie, some rules are simply not as enforceable as others.
St. Paulie, some rules are simply not as enforceable as others.
It would be in the best interest of this forum for Hoodie to change that.
From Bush Declines invite from Mr. Obama for Ground zero visit...and the below was the question posed to you?
"Both are former Presidents. Answer the question and forgo the conjecture. BTW...maybe you can specify which Mr. Obama policies made this event possible and how they differed from President Bush's policies...Sheka? Please"
give your best shot
Fax, I believe you posted your comment on the wrong thread.
justhefac, did you miss my response to you?? There is no telling which of the duplicate threads that I posted it on but my response was essentionally that 9/11 didn't happen on Clinton's watch and it was clear from Junior's response that he can't bear to show his face. Now that is MY answer whether you like it is your problem.
I agree SPG....multiple monikers are un acceptable to me as well...would like to know
who I am talking with....
St. Paulie, you are missing the point. I know this example may leave me open or a witty comeback LOL but it is the best analogy that comes to mind.
US immigration policy vs. actual/ real ability to enforce it. .....................
Barb, I made no attempt to hide my new moniker Sheka (including using the same unique moniker)
Hi Barb !
Apparently that's too logical for others to understand.
Good to see you - it's been a while.
St. Paulie, you are missing the point. I know this example may leave me open or a witty comeback LOL but it is the best analogy that comes to mind.
US immigration policy vs. actual/ real ability to enforce it. .....................
I'm not missing any point . . . Hoodie has the ability to enforce his rules. Had he known he would be dealing with children who go behind his back and log on using different names, he might have set up his "block/ban" tool differently. Let's hope he fixes it now.
Nowhere in the rules does it say a person cannot have multiple monikers. If you want to change the rules - take it up with Hoodie. It is not acceptable for posters to "bitch" and "accuse" incessantly about rules which do not exist!
Here are Hoodie's rule and I do not see "no mutiple monikers"
Most of the time, Gratewire threads are just fine. These rules are for when they are not.
And I see the people who are complaining the most have broken most of those rules!!
What is that saying about pointing the finger....?????
No where in the rules does it say a person cannot have multiple monikers. If you want to change the rules - take it up with Hoodie. But, it is not acceptable for posters to "bitch" incessantly about rules which do not exist!
LOL - I guess Hoodie gave the people on here too much credit for having "common sense".
I see now that he needs to SPELL OUT EVERYTHING . . . maybe a few cartoons might do the trick?
St. Paulie, accept that fact that you were wrong and this was your made up rule. For once, accept that you were wrong before you get backed against the wall (not literally, figure of speech and not a threat- understand the need to clarify due to blogger history).
You guess???? LOL! No one cares what you guess SPG... the rules have been posted and refreshed - and put up in front of everyone for weeks and weeks now because of a nasty skirmish. Read them - follow them - or post elsewhere - that is the gist of it.
She, I knew it was you and you weren't hiding behind a new name....It's the ones on here who feel the need to continually change their names so they can say what they please and think they don't have to worry....most of them forget to change their style of writing though...
Hi SPG...I've been staying away...don't even know what I'm doing here today.
{This
post has been edited. REASON: Attack on another poster}
Pictures directed at GW bloggers are personal attacks also.
Beach Baby - Do you honestly think anyone gives a rat's azz what you think?
SheShe - Show me the rule where it says that once you are blocked/banned you are welcomed to log back on using a different name.
{This
post has been edited. REASON: Discussions between two GW members about another GW member should be done PRIVATELY on PM)
Hey Barb -
Well I'm glad you stopped in. I've missed you, but I can certainly understand why you've stayed away !!
As you can see, you haven't missed much !
We may be on the inside looking out but I see the primary difference in style and approach with the exception of Squeeky, is liberal or conservative. The hypocrisy is that conservatives want it one way so they can feel comfortable. There must be something here because even if you are not posting, the fact that you are reading or lurking is an investment!
I think the expectation or comfort level for conservatives is that we should have point of view. That is not happening!
I keep going back to me on Greta's blog, I have this false expectation when I blogged there. I could have said the sky is blue and there was alway something waiting to come after me and I had a choice to engage or not. Simple as that but I never ran and I was never a victim.
She, I don't stay away from anyone who is civilized...and you and I have spoken several times...I do NOT like name change...hated it at GW and dropped off there for that reason...I don't like filth...I don't enjoy hateful comments...and the answer is yes if SPG was a lib I would still talk to her...as I have you...and a few others on here.
SPG,
I'm new here and I didn't follow the exchange yesterday, but one of the first things I did when I joined a few days ago was read the rules. And I honestly do not see any rule that you prevents you from having multiple accounts. Now commen sense would see how this "rule" would apply to someone harassing and stalking. But I haven't seen SheShe do any of that.
SheShe - Show me the rule where it says that once you are blocked/banned you are welcomed to log back on using a different name.
===================
Please read your comment. Why on earth would that need to be a rule? Are you saying there are some unspoken rules that we must follow? If that is the case, the field is too wide open.
sheshe or sheka, I said early in this post that I would respect you more if you could debate as in adult...see above for my initial comment. you responded and I repeated my question about which policies did Mr. Obama implement in regards to the muder of bin laden, and how did they differ from those implemented by President Bush? So far you have avoided the question. I realize this is sorta off topic...but than again it goes to civility, which of course is the topic of this post!
Find a different thread to get that question answered will you, j-t-f1
Diva - You're new here? um, okay . . . so what is your definition of the word "Blocked" ?
The "person" is being blocked/banned . . . not the moniker. Is that too hard to understand?
I didn't see jtf1 intial question and there is no need to assume that I won't answer either. I sure didn't see it posted on this thread.
You know there is always the option that if you don't like the rules here - you can go elsewhere or even start your own forum.
You must log in to post.
