<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>GrateWire &#187; Tag: batshit crazy - Recent Posts</title>
		<link>http://gratewire.com/tags/batshit-crazy</link>
		<description>News &amp; Opinion - Grated Fresh Daily</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://gratewire.com/rss/tags/batshit-crazy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Obot 50549535 on "MRC Has Trouble Admitting Conservative Website Broke Bachmann Story"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/mrc-has-trouble-admitting-conservative-website-broke-bachmann-story#post-66801</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Obot 50549535</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66801@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Maybe MRC would prefer an approach like mine: I presume that the story is untrue, because most of the stories in the Daily Caller are untrue. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I am curious what motivated the Daily Caller to originate such a damaging rumor against a prominent wingnut.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; &#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Beach Baby on "MRC Has Trouble Admitting Conservative Website Broke Bachmann Story"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/mrc-has-trouble-admitting-conservative-website-broke-bachmann-story#post-66758</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Beach Baby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66758@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;LMAO&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Black Lion on "MRC Has Trouble Admitting Conservative Website Broke Bachmann Story"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/mrc-has-trouble-admitting-conservative-website-broke-bachmann-story#post-66754</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Black Lion</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66754@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;span class=&#34;title&#34;&#62;MRC Has Trouble Admitting Conservative Website Broke Bachmann Story&#60;/span&#62;&#60;br /&#62;&#60;span class=&#34;mood&#34;&#62;&#60;strong&#62;Topic:&#60;/strong&#62; Media Research Center&#60;/span&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The story of Michele Bachmann's migraines has been the sensation of the week in the political world, but the Media Research Center has had trouble dealing with one inconvenient fact: The story was first published by a conservative outlet, the &#60;a href=&#34;http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/18/stress-related-condition-incapacitates-bachmann-heavy-pill-use-alleged/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;Daily Caller&#60;/a&#62;.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;A July 20 TimesWatch &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.mrc.org/timeswatch/articles/2011/20110720123455.aspx&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;post&#60;/a&#62; by Clay Waters was in straightforward denial mode. While bashing the New York Times for latching onto the story, he acknowledged that the Daily Caller first reported it and denounced it as an &#34;anonymously sourced report,&#34; but he failed to note the Caller's conservative ideology.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;NewsBusters' Mark Finkelstein, meanwhile, &#60;a href=&#34;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2011/07/21/heilemann-bachmann-migraine-story-calculated-hit-piece-gop-rival-n&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;sought to distract&#60;/a&#62; from that inconvenient fact. Finkelstein conceded that &#34;the story first appeared in the conservative Daily Caller,&#34; but he attacked John Heilemann for pointing out that the story was not the product of a &#34;liberal media conspiracy.&#34; Finkelstein then declared that the story's origin doesn't matter: &#34;And consider that even if the MSM didn't originate the story, liberal outlets like the New York Times have gleefully sought to exploit it to Bachmann's detriment.&#34;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Such wholesale refusal to acknowledge, or insistence on distrcting from, such an obvious fact shows that the MRC is much more interested in being a right-wing political website than a &#34;media research center.&#34; &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; &#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Checker on "Why Libs Don&#039;t Like Palin and Bachmann"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/why-libs-dont-like-palin-and-bachmann#post-66238</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Checker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66238@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Maher.....&#34;That is some twisted shit'.......LMAO!&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Black Lion on "Why Libs Don&#039;t Like Palin and Bachmann"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/why-libs-dont-like-palin-and-bachmann#post-66175</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Black Lion</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66175@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Good points by Maher...These women are stupid and crazy...And you as a voter would have to be insane to vote them into any position of power...&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Beach Baby on "Why Libs Don&#039;t Like Palin and Bachmann"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/why-libs-dont-like-palin-and-bachmann#post-66162</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Beach Baby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66162@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I rewatched the video and watched all of Maher's guests as his dialogue was ongoing.  The body language is hysterical.  While in agreement, most of the men are twisting and pushing themselves forward in signs of discomfort.
&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Nice to know that most men don't like to put a woman down in public - but we better wake up and become more like Bill or we are going to end up with one of the bat-shit crazy nutjob women in the office of the president.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Beach Baby on "Why Libs Don&#039;t Like Palin and Bachmann"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/why-libs-dont-like-palin-and-bachmann#post-66161</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Beach Baby</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66161@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Bill Maher is extremely astute.&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Black Butterfly on "Why Libs Don&#039;t Like Palin and Bachmann"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/why-libs-dont-like-palin-and-bachmann#post-66148</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Black Butterfly</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66148@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Leave it to Bill to be so straight forward and honest.......simply put....they are crazy.  I love his comment about Palin....&#34;a bully who sells patriotism like a pimp&#34; LOL &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; &#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Monkey Boy on "Why Libs Don&#039;t Like Palin and Bachmann"</title>
			<link>http://gratewire.com/topic/why-libs-dont-like-palin-and-bachmann#post-66147</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 22:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Monkey Boy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">66147@http://gratewire.com/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkKS5RrePyg&#38;amp;feature=player_embedded&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkKS5RrePyg&#38;amp;feature=player_embedded&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
